#Synovial fluid analysis chart manual
How Automated Body Fluid Testing is DifferentĪutomated counting removes many of the variables involved with manual review. Lastly, it’s a labor-intensive process because it requires the staff's full attention and they are unable to perform any other tasks.Īfter all this manual work, results must be calculated by hand and this can potentially cause clerical and mathematical errors- even with the use of a calculator. It’s also a subjective approach where competency and technique of testing personnel are not always consistent.
Manual review requires a well-trained, licensed personnel due to the testing complexity. While manual counting is the gold standard, there are numerous downsides to the process, as it is time consuming, taking at least 30 minutes to an hour to perform a total RBC and WBC count. How Body Fluids are Analyzedīody fluid analysis is performed in one of two overall ways: manual cell count using a hemocytometer and an automated approach using an automated analyzer. However, lately there’s been a shift to an automated approach, including analyzer-based body fluid analysis. However, it’s an imperative part of diagnosis, as fluid analysis assists in the identification of certain disease states including meningitis, hemorrhage, malignancy, inflammation, viral, bacterial/parasitic infections and more.īecause urgent diagnostic data is often sought after from even a very limited sample for the diagnosis of these disease states, accuracy and speed of results take on even greater importance.įor this reason, laboratories have traditionally resorted to manual body fluid cell counting to ensure the highest quality of insights.
Body fluid analysis is a challenging task for most labs because the samples-such as cerebrospinal, synovial, pleural fluid, pericardial, peritoneal and general serous fluid are difficult to draw- not to mention a discomforting experience for the patient.
0 kommentar(er)
